Typing on a Smartwatch for Smart Glasses
summary
Implements two smartwatch-to-glasses input methods, a modified SwipeBoard and a new HoldBoard, and evaluates them with 125-person acceptability survey, a 12-participant seated study and an 8-participant walking followup. HoldBoard reaches 10.85 wpm seated and 9.02 wpm walking; SwipeBoard hits 9.10 wpm seated and 7.66 wpm walking. Results show TOSS methods outperform direct glass typing (SwipeBoard on glasses 7.14 wpm; HoldBoard up to ~70% faster) and work without constant visual attention to the watch.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (17)
- 0:00Introduction
- 0:28Smart glasses input challenges
- 1:15Need for text entry on glasses
- 1:36Limitations of speech and mid-air input
- 2:19Touch-based input on glasses frame
- 3:07Smartwatch as wearable input device
- 3:28Concept of TOSS explained
- 3:50Online survey on text entry postures
- 5:16Survey results and TOSS preference
- 5:38Design rationale for TOSS
- 6:21SwipeBoard implementation
- 8:16HoldBoard design and features
- 11:25Seated condition experiment
- 13:36Walking condition evaluation
- 14:23TOSS performance vs typing on glasses
- 15:51Summary and conclusion
- 16:33Q&A session
related talks
21mDualKey: Miniature Screen Text Entry via Finger Identification
12mEvaluation of Korean Text Entry Methods for Smartwatches
20mDriftBoard: A Panning-Based Text Entry Technique for Ultra-Small Touchscreens
06mToward Lightweight In-situ Self-reporting: An Exploratory Study of Alternative Smartwatch ...
20mOne-Dimensional Handwriting: Inputting Letters and Words on Smart Glasses
20mTipText: Eyes-Free Text Entry on a Fingertip Keyboard
21mThe Impact of Word, Multiple Word, and Sentence Input on Virtual Keyboard Decoding Performance
05mAuthentication UX Design Opportunities for Future Smart Glasses