Do We Need Network Constitutions?
summary
Argues that networks already have constitutions: code, whitepapers and norms guided real upgrades like the 2010 fix, SegWit and Taproot and Bitcoin signaling via blocks; governance mixes on‑chain voting, forums, improvement proposals and developer coordination; identifies three scaling bottlenecks — complexity, alignment and participants — and shows a working remedy: a written or codified constitution clarifies processes, mediates disputes and helps onboard contributors while slowing change to maintain treasury as collective pot reliability.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (8)
- 0:00Introduction
- 1:10Does Bitcoin have a constitution
- 10:42Free values
- 12:08Voluntary participation
- 13:10Governance
- 14:58Legislative and Executive
- 16:23Forcrazies
- 18:13Why do we need them
related talks
15mDoes a Crypto Network Exist Without a Community?
19mSocial Contracts for Web3 Coordination
47mCant we just agree
11mThe Democratisation of Financial Services
01h 01mRegulation through Governance
40mDelivering on the Promise of Decentralization: Why Open Source Development is Essential for Block...
27mGrowing Open Networks in Web 3
27mProtocolizing Tokenized Communities