Responsible AI: Policy Solutions for DevSecOps
summary
BSA represents about 40 enterprise software companies and presents concrete policy tools: a 50-page 2019 framework for bias reduction, promoted risk management programs and impact assessments now being pushed toward NIST-style adoption; procurement is the lever that can enforce them. Governments and summits are coordinating globally, there's a 12–18 month window to align rules, and pressing specifics include training-data provenance, IP for creative work, abuse-mitigation practices, and who carries liability for model outputs.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (9)
- 0:00Introduction and background
- 2:58Role of legal in AI adoption
- 5:26Regulatory challenges in AI
- 7:55Global AI regulation opportunities
- 10:01Regulation driving innovation
- 11:46Risk management in AI development
- 13:29Upcoming policy trends
- 16:15IP and liability in generative AI
- 19:46Balancing government mandates and outcomes
related talks
39mBuilding a Responsible AI Governance Program
50mSecurity as Part of Responsible AI: At Home or At Odds?
36mResponsible AI: In Theory, Practice, and Policies
31mPanel: Navigating the AI Policy Landscape
53mAI: Law, Policy and Common Sense Suggestions on How to Stay Out of Trouble
56mKeynote: Leading innovation responsibly in the race for AI
34mRisks of AI Risk Policy: Five Lessons
51mIntersection of International Relations and AI