Decentralized Cryptography: A Distant Dream or an Immediate Possibility?
summary
Panel argues threshold crypto moves from theory to scattered practice: live trusted setup ceremonies with dozens of participants produce SNARK parameters, but many deployments use aggregated signatures instead of full DKGs because of tooling and proof complexity; NIST and IETF work toward standards like FROST/MuSig variants. Real systems stress anonymous channels and mixnets for survivability after DDoS, expose risks from retained key backups and retrospective corruption, and highlight missing multi‑codebase implementations, adaptive‑adversary proofs, and economic/governance models.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (5)
- 0:00Start
- 1:00Christian Kashin
- 2:04Andrew Miller
- 33:37How Can End Users Know that They Can Trust the System
- 37:38Examples of Governance
related talks
39mPrivacy and Evolution of SNARKs
36mPanel Discussion
28mAsynchronous Distributed Key Generation
53mPanel: Migrating to Post-Quantum Schemes
01h 06mFrom Theory to Practice - Threshold Cryptography
44mThe Cryptographers' Panel
40mCryptography in Distributed Systems
01h 00mThe Path to Shielded Programmability
