Quantum Pseudorandomness and Classical Complexity
summary
Constructs a simple quantum oracle where BQP = QMA relative to a quantum oracle while simultaneously pseudorandom quantum states (PRSs) exist relative to that oracle, showing a black‑box separation between PRSs and usual cryptographic primitives. Uses Haar concentration and the BBBV search lower bound. Proves the converse: if BQP = PP (i.e., can solve #P) then PRSs cannot exist by combining classical shadows protocols with postselection (post‑BQP = PP). Also rules out hyper‑efficient shadow tomography from black‑box state access.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (10)
- 0:00Intro
- 0:33Pseudorandom States (PRSs): "Computational approx. to Haar measure"
- 2:31Cryptography
- 4:20Definition (li, Liu, Song 2018)
- 8:14"QMA" protocol to break PRSS Suppose Arthur has @T Merlin: send quantum circuit C
- 12:49Theorem (This work) There exists a quantum oracle O such that
- 21:46Haar-random oracle
- 27:01Classical shadows (Huang, kueng, Preskill 2020)
- 28:49Classical oracles?
- 31:09William Kretschmer
related talks
01h 06mQuantum Advantage Without Structure
59mQuantum cryptography and quantum complexity
44mQuantum Meets Minimum Circuit Size Problem
58mTwo classical oracle separations between QMA and QCMA
42mQuantum Learning Algorithms Imply Circuit Lower Bounds
01h 09mAre Random Quantum Circuits PRUs?
01h 31mLightning Talks
22mQbC: Quantum Correctness by Construction
