Interview with Barbara Cosgrove
summary
Claims that global privacy laws are proliferating and regulators are now talking about simplification to reduce administrative burden, insists on consistent controller/processor roles to avoid divergent handling of rights, and argues enterprises need interoperable rules so HR systems can move data worldwide. Cites investment in demonstrable trust mechanisms, naming EU cloud code of conduct adherence and binding corporate rules, advocates for a US federal privacy law, and says conferences enable focused regulator–industry interoperability work.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (5)
- 0:00Introduction
- 1:21What are the main challenges with data governance in the years to come?
- 2:25How important are international dialogue and cooperation for data governance?
- 3:18Why are conferences such as the Privacy Symposium important?
- 5:20Trust and accountability are essential for data transfers. What is your view on data protection certification?
related talks
05mInterview with Ulrich Kelber
01h 14mThe EU-US interface: Is it possible?
22mPanel Discussion – 17 months of GDPR experience – Should we review?
01h 09mREGULATION OF GLOBAL DATA FLOWS: A STORY OF THE IMPOSSIBLE?
30mPanel: Do We Need a Global Approach to Data Protection?
17mKeynote
01h 12mPrivacy by analogy. Lessons from copyright law, environmental law ...
10mImpulse: Do We Need a Global Approach to Data Protection?
