A structured approach to the quantum safe transformation
summary
Argues organizations must stop at inventories and adopt a phased migration that prioritizes by business criticality, not by counting certificates; recommends a high-level inventory then criticality scoring to pick the first systems, expects signature migrations can require one to two years per regulated use case, and pushes a central PKI team to create policies, RFPs and HSM upgrades aligned with product cycles. Notes hybrid certs vary, cryptographic agility is contextual (telco vs bank), and monitoring/enforcement must prove legacy is retired.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (9)
- 0:00Quantum safe transformation intro
- 1:03Quantum crypto migration risks
- 4:53Prioritizing quantum transformation
- 8:24Business use cases for quantum safe
- 11:52Defining what needs to be done and who should do it
- 15:03Phased quantum safe roadmap
- 18:35PKI and hybrid certificates
- 20:40Cryptographic agility limits
- 23:08Q&A on crypto agility
related talks
33mComparing Strategies for Quantum-Safe Cryptography Adoption in Organizations
20mLeading the Quantum-safe Transition: A Growth Stages Approach
38mPKI deployments are as unique as any snowflake; how to build equally flexible PQ migration strategie
39mStrategies for Transitioning to Future-Proof Cryptography
34mArchitecting PKI Hierarchies for Graceful PQ Migration
20mHybrid Approach for quantim safe PKI Development for Organizations HAPKIDO
10mSummary and Closing
22mPost Quantum Policy and Roadmap of the BSI