Threshold, Influence, Noise, and Discrete Harmonic Analysis
summary
Asks when near-equality in Harper’s edge-expansion bound actually forces structure: for muP(f) = T and P·I_P(f) within constant of the T·log_P(T) optimum, conjectures that one can fix a set S of size O(log(1/T)) that boosts the conditional density — a Bourgain-style inverse theorem upgrade used to locate sharp thresholds; proves a negative result for large-set influence showing mu(f) may need to be ≥ exp(−n^β) (tribes variant), and raises concrete questions on noise-stable vs noise-sensitive decomposition, K-wise independence improvements to KKL/Harper, and robustness of percolation crossings and random-matrix eigenvalue events.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (6)
- 0:00Introduction
- 0:20Inverse theorems for Harper inequality
- 14:20Large set influences and projections
- 28:05Noise sensitivity in Boolean functions
- 37:17Open questions
- 43:19Q&A
related talks
38mAn Information Theoretic View of Hypercontractivity
45mThe lower tail: Poisson approximation revisited
56mSome Probabilistic Uses of Dirichlet Eigenvectors
01h 12mPedagogical Talk: Frameworks for Information-Computation Tradeoffs
27mDetection and Estimation through an Information Theory Lens
11mSharp Threshold for the Planted Matching Problem
01h 03mHigh Dimensional Geometry and Concentration II
01h 00mLog-concave Polynomials and Spectral Independence 2
