~/talk

Quantitative measures for software Architecture quality evaluation

links:none on file
slides:none on file

Proposes a lightweight, checklist-style evaluation questionnaire that maps prioritized requirements to twelve quality attributes, uses an enhanced architecture document capturing rationale, and scores answers on a 1–5 scoring scale to produce a numeric quality score. Applies domain + technical evaluators, allows go/no‑go or targeted refinements, and pairs with POCs or simulations for performance/security checks. Pilot on a pricing architecture at Red Hat cuts review feedback from 4–6 weeks to under 24 hours.

AI-written summary · about

  1. 0:00Introduction and motivation
  2. 2:08Why architecture evaluation matters
  3. 7:25Common evaluation methods
  4. 13:21Quantifying architecture quality
  5. 16:11Structured evaluation process
  6. 23:09Evaluation questionnaire examples
  7. 29:14Real-world application results
  8. 30:43Q&A session
~/search
type to search 6,249 conferences, 138,987 speakers and 185,172 talks
~/help
cmdctrl k
search every conference, speaker and series
/
focus the filter search
h
home
c
conferences
s
speakers
e
series
t
light / dark — the status bar button does the same
?
this help
esc
close this, then clear every filter — or just the search, while you are typing in it

Ignored while you are typing. Pages without a filter rail have no search to focus.