"Building Highly Performant Animations in Elm"
summary
Compares three concrete implementations and measures their effect on frame rate: a pure Elm approach using AnimationFrame subscription that becomes cumbersome and drops FPS into the teens with lots of DOM work, a declarative CSS keyframes approach that leverages browser optimizations but needs manual timeline syncing, and a bridge to the Web Animations API via a web component plus JSON encoder that runs at 60 FPS, emits finish events to coordinate sequences, and relies on Chrome/Firefox support (polyfill available).
AI-written summary · about
chapters (5)
- 0:00Introduction and motivation
- 3:02Pure Elm approach
- 9:34CSS animation land
- 14:56Web animation API
- 22:57Conclusion and Q&A








