Policy meets protocol
summary
Europe’s MiCA framework is the clearest landscape claim but is already comprehensive but outdated on day one, while Bosnia is actively drafting a crypto law meant to attract projects and real‑economy use. Regulators admit low crypto knowledge and prefer dialogue, working groups, and simple one‑pager disclosures; industry counters with offshore company structures and jurisdictional arbitrage that already fuel a fresh wave of M&A into Europe. Panelists stress that code cannot replace legal accountability — there must be a legal person behind the code.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (16)
- 0:00Introduction
- 1:49Europe’s crypto regulation
- 3:13Engaging with regulators
- 4:16Innovation vs regulation
- 6:00Europe’s policy leadership
- 10:11Decentralized code regulation
- 11:57Regulatory arbitrage in EU
- 13:45Bureaucracy as advantage
- 15:52On-chain governance accountability
- 16:36Bosnia’s regulatory gaps
- 18:01Industry shaping policy
- 18:43Policy communication path
- 19:47Revenue before compliance
- 21:10Bosnia crypto steps
- 21:33Invest in Bosnia
- 22:15Final words
related talks
33mDecentralization and the Next Wave of Regulations
18mHow Europe is Becoming the Biggest Crypto Market Globally in 2025
33mWhich stablecoin framework will shape the future?
15mEurope's Crypto Momentum
09mMalta's Digital Innovation Landscape: A conversation with Kenneth Brincat
25mMoney Movements In Web3
30mPanel | Stablecoins: How Can Europe Compete Internationally?
38mBlockchain 4.0: What's Next After the Crypto Winter 2.0