Spatial Coupling vs. Block Coding: A Comparison
summary
Describes spatially coupled LDPC constructed from protographs by edge spreading (example m=2) and lifted with permutation matrices, showing threshold saturation where BP thresholds track MAP (rate-1/2 BEC threshold ≈0.488 vs Shannon 0.5). Wavefront propagation from low-degree checks gives wave-like decoding, but practical approach to MAP needs large section length (tens of thousands per section). Uses a sliding-window decoder to cut latency; simulations show a few‑tenths dB gain and latency reductions of 2–3× versus block LDPC at similar complexity.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (16)
- 0:00Intro
- 1:26LDPC Block Codes
- 2:06Code Ensembles - Minimum Distance
- 3:16Thresholds of (J.K)-regular LDPC Block Code Ensembles
- 4:08Protograph Representation
- 9:43Terminated Spatially Coupled Codes
- 12:10Wave-like Decoding of Terminated
- 13:57Thresholds of Terminated
- 17:20Threshold Saturation (BEC)
- 20:13Distance Measures for SC-LDPC Codes
- 21:23Decoding SC-LDPC Codes
- 22:11Window Decoding Performance
- 23:26Finite-Length Scaling for SC-LDPC Codes
- 24:16Equal Latency Comparison for (3,6)-Regular LDPC Codes
- 25:44Complexity Tradeoffs
- 28:43Regular SC-LDPC Codes vs. Irregular LDPC-BCs
