Effective Code Review
summary
Concrete rules and tools replace vague exhortations: require a short description and test plan on each PR, keep changes small and single‑purpose, prefer submit reviews in batch and use GitHub/GitLab features to reduce back‑and‑forth, rely on use IntelliJ commit dialog for formatting and changed‑file checks, add screenshots and labels, record follow‑up tickets for nonblocking work, summarize mixed comments and always include at least one praise, and write test plans for risky refactors.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (23)
- 0:00Introduction
- 0:48What is Code Review
- 2:21Bag Example
- 4:38Blocking Comments
- 5:49Example
- 6:58Review When
- 9:15Review
- 9:48Questions
- 10:49Suggestions
- 12:18Examples
- 13:01Why
- 14:24Alternatives
- 17:01End of Review
- 19:42Comments
- 21:04Emojis
- 22:29Retrospective
- 23:20Criticism
- 24:29Examples of Criticism
- 26:13Questions Answers
- 27:44Pull Request
- 29:08Documentation
- 33:14Productivity
- 33:58Keeping small
related talks
05mAn Effective Code Review
22mContinuous Improvements of The Code Review Process
23mDrama-Free Code Review!
21mContinuous Improvements of The Code Review Process
40mCode Review - How to Do It Better?
53mCode Review - how to do it better?
53mCode Review Beyond Code Style
41mCracking the Code Review from Guesswork to Automated Guidance