The Regulatory Landscape
summary
The panel lays out concrete bottlenecks: custody remains unresolved for banks, price feeds come from 150 trading venues and MVIS/Nasdaq are three exchanges under surveillance with four more in the works, OTC liquidity (Circle Genesis Cumberland) supplies 20–50% OTC market share, and regulators split classification (SEC = securities, CFTC = commodity, IRS = property). ICOs raised about $16 billion and many tokens crash ~90%. Trail to a Bitcoin ETF needs robust custody, proven surveillance, and audited indices before approval.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (18)
- 0:00Intro
- 0:47Meet the speakers
- 3:40Introductions
- 6:02Challenges with regulators
- 11:21Regulatory landscape in Asia
- 19:34Could there have been more aggressive regulation
- 26:26What is sufficiently decentralized
- 28:41Decentralization
- 32:29Regulation
- 34:21Global phenomena
- 41:14Questions
- 41:33Exchange Traded Notes
- 41:58ETFs in Europe
- 42:28AMA1 Multiasset ETF
- 44:05Bitcoin Price
- 45:43Quick Questions
- 46:17ICO vs STO
- 47:58ICO vs Exchange
related talks
31mCrypto-privacy on the policy agenda: What comes next?
48mBitcoin Legal Panel
20mConsumer Protection on the Blockchain
56mRegulation/Policy Panel
39mNavigating the Regulatory Turbulence of the Web3 Wave
34mLiquidity Flood: Effects Of Traditional Capital Entering The Crypto Market
21mAccelerate USA 2026: Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand and Sen. Ruben Gallego
45mWhat's Next for Crypto Policy?