Session 1
summary
Proposal creates a new Data Protection Agency (DPA) with subpoena and civil investigative demand power, authority to prescribe rules, and explicit enforcement beyond the FTC; House language eyes $1 billion for a bureau but advocates say that’s insufficient. Three state laws (California, Colorado, Virginia) exist and Virginia’s law becomes effective January 1, 2023, creating compliance burdens and vendor contract churn. FTC rulemaking is slow and lacks first‑time civil penalty authority, so federal statute plus clarified enforcement is the concrete gap to close.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (13)
- 0:00Start
- 2:58Meeting Rooms
- 3:28Reception Area
- 6:44Kirsten Gillibrand
- 13:36The Ideas and Policies That Shape Legislation
- 17:05Chief Arguments for Private Right of Action
- 17:38Chief Argument against Private Right of Action
- 20:20State Enforcers of Data Privacy
- 24:34How Are Small and Medium Enterprises Dealing with those Compliance Issues
- 30:21Federal Privacy Legislation
- 33:07Dane Snowden
- 37:01States Passed Comprehensive Privacy Legislation
- 1:19:02Second Session
related talks
01h 02mPeople, Industry & Government
01h 16mSession 1
19mData Protection for Developers: Past, Present, and Future
27mFireside Chat
44mPanel Discussion – Data Policy and Global Data Privacy Developments
52mData Protection and Privacy Development Around the World
07mOpening Speech Day 2
01h 16mEnforcing Digital Regulation in Times of Omnibus