On constant T-depth circuits
summary
Claims that many basic quantum subroutines admit constant T-depth constructions: single-qubit rotations (including programmable rotation) and the quantum part of Shor’s algorithm require a catalyst state of size N for N-bit precision, while reversible encoded addition needs no catalyst. Key tools are a GF(2^n) encoding (multiplication becomes a Clifford/CNOT), Chudnovsky-style bilinear decompositions giving R = O(n) so out-of-place multiplication runs at Toffoli depth 2 with linear ancilla, and experiments showing magic-state fidelities improved (physical 2-qubit error ~1.1×10^-3, encoded magic ~5.5×10^-4).
AI-written summary · about
chapters (7)
- 0:00Constant T-depth circuits
- 7:57Optimizing T-depth in compilation
- 10:24Low T-depth subroutines
- 27:51Constant T-depth rotation
- 34:51Programmable rotations in T-depth
- 46:20Open problems in T-depth circuits
- 48:04Conclusion
related talks
29mEfficiently Verifying Quantum Programs with Few T Gates
01h 01mWhat Is "Quantum" About Quantum Computing?
32mOptimal Quantum Programs
02h 41mLightning Talks
01h 10mQuantum Advantage with Shallow Clifford Circuits
48mQuantum Linear Algebra Using Subspace States
42mLearning Shallow Quantum Circuits and Quantum States Prepared by Shallow Circuits in Polynomial Time
15mScalable Equivalence Checking and Verification of Shallow Quantum Circuits
