Oracle Separations Between QMA and QCMA
summary
Surveys explicit constructions that separate QMA vs QCMA under nonstandard oracles: a quantum oracle that reflects one random state (needs a quantum witness and is provably hard for classical proofs), a distributional adjacency-list problem called expander-distinguishing whose QMA protocol uses phase estimation on a provided eigenstate, and constructions that embed a tiny decision bit in indices hard to find via Yamakawa‑Zhandry invertibility so classical witnesses and queries fail. Follow-ups relax verifier access to nonadaptive quantum queries; a full classical (standard) oracle separation remains open.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (7)
- 0:00QMA and QCMA separations
- 1:04QMA vs QCMA definitions
- 10:12Motivation for oracle separations
- 19:06Random circuit oracle separation
- 21:58Expander graph oracle separation
- 34:11Restricting oracle access
- 42:44Open problems in QMA vs QCMA
related talks
25mQuantum NP and Beyond
22mQuantum space, ground space traversal, and how to embed multi-prover...
49mQuantum Cryptanalysis
01h 20mVerifiable Quantum Supremacy: What I Hope Will Be Done
57mA Simple Quantum Sketch With Applications to Graph Algorithms
46mInteractive Proofs for Verifying Machine Learning
59mThe Bizarre Quantum World with Q# and Azure Quantum
01h 03mMicrosoft Q# and Azure Quantum
