The Mystery of the Missing String
summary
Equivalence between the simple missing string task and relativized exponential lower bounds: finding a string outside M strings of length N (with M ≈ 2^{εN}) is shown to be tightly equivalent to whether σ2E needs 2^{εn}-size oracle circuits. A halving algorithm uses ~M total probes (one-probe when M ≤ N), and a k-probe tradeoff sits between k and Θ(k log k. The proof uses uniform quasi-polynomial depth-3 AC0 circuits for missing string, a normal form that encodes oracle behavior, and yields new time-hierarchy corollaries; the status of depth‑3 lower bounds remains open.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (13)
- 0:00Introduction
- 0:50Stereo complexity
- 2:10Smallest known class
- 3:45Highlevel sketch
- 6:52The missing string
- 9:47Exponential Complexity
- 13:46Missing String
- 21:54Example
- 30:54Generic Theorem
- 37:22Why is there a tight connection
- 41:05Local algorithms
- 44:12Hierarchy theorems
- 46:55Questions
related talks
16mOn Oracles and Algorithmic Methods for Proving Lower Bounds
36mExponential Separation of Information and Communication
57mTowards P≠NP from Extended Frege Lower Bounds
19mAlgorithms and Lower Bounds for Comparator Circuits from Shrinkage
01h 02mConsistency of NEXP Not in P/poly in a Strong Theory
01h 04mExplicit SoS Lower Bounds from (Small-Set) High Dimensional Expanders
47mHardness Amplification and the Approximate Degree of Constant-Depth Circuits
30mStreaming Lower Bounds for Approximating MAX-CUT
