LOPSTR+PPDP Discussion
summary
Combining LOPSTR and PPDP with ICFP is described as an experiment to boost submissions and visibility; registrations for the colocated ICFP year drop by about a third and submissions are noticeably lower, with visa and travel costs cited as major factors. Organizers consider alternate collocation with ICLP or ICFP, running a survey past attendees about preferred regions and format, adding bridging tutorials or embedded DSL sessions to connect logic and functional communities, and preferring open‑access proceedings over Springer paywalls.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (8)
- 0:00LOPSTR+PPDP experiment
- 1:28Collocation preferences ICFP ICLP
- 5:00Logic versus functional programming
- 11:15Location travel impact attendance
- 14:12Declining paper submissions reasons
- 17:29Attendee survey future planning
- 20:16Open access publication preferences
- 23:35Wrap-up social plans
related talks
50mThe Parallel Universes of ISPOs an...- 50mPanel Discussion: The Parallel Universes of ISPOs and OSPOs
29mCollaboration with Universities and Enterprises OSPO: What's Next?
38mBoF: Collaboration With Universities and Enterprises OSPO
41mThe OSPO Panel of JAPAN 2023: How to Accelerate OSPO?
43mRise of the OSPO in Industry, Academia & Municipal Gov.
39mOSPOs in Energy, Transport, Automotive & Public Sector
06mClosing Remarks