Clustering Under Perturbation Resilience
summary
Shows polynomial-time exact algorithms for symmetric and asymmetric k‑center assuming 2-perturbation resilience, and proves no algorithm below 2 unless NP=RP. Symmetric case uses a 2‑approximation turned into an optimal solution via a tailored 2‑stretch perturbation; asymmetric case defines a set A of good points (points mutual within r), builds r balls, prunes by a margin and subset rules, then attaches remaining points. r* is guessed from O(n^2) candidate distances; hardness uses reductions from Dominating Set and Valiant‑Vazirani.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (12)
- 0:00Intro
- 6:12Perturbation Resilience
- 13:49Prior Work
- 17:00Case Center
- 20:46Asymmetric Case
- 22:37Properties
- 24:40Useful Properties
- 25:46Key Observation
- 27:29Algorithm
- 30:23Optimal Algorithm
- 34:45Conclusion
- 36:01Discussion
related talks
25mLucky Talk: From Coding to Clustering
40mMonte Carlo Approximation Certificates for K-Means Clustering
37mPower to the Points: Local Certificates for Clusterings
37mThe Sum-of-Squares Approach to Clustering Non-Spherical Gaussian Mixtures
51mExact Recovery via Convex Relaxations
38mRed Points and Blue Points
09mConvex Programs, Computational Phase Transitions, and Robust Algorithms
48mUnstructured Hardness to Average-Case Randomness
