Implicit Regularization I
summary
Overparameterized nets and matrix completion have many global minima, yet the chosen optimizer determines which beach the solution lands on: SGD vs Adam difference shows both reach zero training loss but give different test error; factorizing W = U V (two n×n factors, 2n^2 parameters) and running gradient descent biases toward the min-nuclear-norm solution, recovering low‑rank matrices on held‑out entries; minibatch SGD and step‑size choices (exact line search vs small fixed step) change the implicit regularizer and thus generalization.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (13)
- 0:00Introduction
- 3:10Boosting
- 4:44Complexity Control
- 17:02Optimization Landscape
- 19:24Biases
- 20:09Matrix Completion
- 22:54Gradient Descent
- 27:00Outline
- 28:23Goal of Learning
- 30:17Example
- 35:48Stochastic Optimization
- 38:15Recap
- 41:52Stochastic Gradient Descent
related talks
01h 01mOptimization's Untold Gift to Learning: Implicit Regularization
11mOn Implicit Regularization in Deep Learning
23mOn Implicit Regularization in Deep Learning
46mKernel and Deep Regimes in Overparameterized Learning
29mImplicit Regularization in Nonconvex Statistical Estimation
01h 37mTutorial: Implicit Bias II
47mIs Minimax Optimization the Right Framework to Understand Learning in Minimax Games?
01h 04mOptimization for Machine Learning II
