CPDP ACADEMIC SESSION III
summary
Four focused papers report concrete findings: a Canadian employment‑law review documents automated hiring systems that routinely drop qualified resumes (Amazon screening example) and urges individual or corporate accountability rather than mere transparency; an EU study surveys 23 DPAs surveyed and builds an indicator grouping states into six disclosure tiers (Spain/Ireland high, Germany/Austria low) around whether fines and shame lists are published; a deployed Nym mixnet prototype uses mixnet with cover traffic and zk‑credentials plus token incentives and scales; an e‑voting reverse‑engineering finds a four receipts bug and ballot‑box relocation attacks and proposes fixes.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (6)
- 0:00Welcome
- 1:28AI and employment law
- 22:22GDPR enforcement transparency
- 39:01Privacy with Nim mixnet
- 55:34EV voting security analysis
- 1:08:54Closing & Q&A
related talks
01h 42mAcademic sessions (4)
47mDeploying DP: Experiences from the Front Lines and Open Challenges
34mPanel Discussion
01h 14mSenior Academic Session I.
45mMaking Privacy Technology Accessible: Benchmarks and Platforms
29mKeynote Presentation: Minding the (Privacy Research/Practice) Gap
01h 12mDPAS IN THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
01h 13mAcademic sessions on data processing and privacy