Open Source BPM Comparison
summary
Comparison covers four engines: jBPM, Camunda v8, Flowable, Activiti. jBPM claims the largest feature set and is refactoring as Kojito for cloud native microservices; Camunda removes embedded mode in v8, offers Camunda Cloud on GCP and emphasizes remote scaling; Flowable demonstrates running the engine in AWS Lambda; Activiti and Flowable share a fork history. Community commits show Camunda and Flowable most active recently, jBPM steady third. Capital One reports mixed production use on AWS across embedded and standalone deployments.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (12)
- 0:00Start
- 2:42What is workflow?
- 3:50Complex workflow characteristics
- 5:40What is a BPM product? What problems do they solve?
- 7:05Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN)
- 8:30Decision Modeling Notation (DMN)
- 9:02Case Management Modeling Notation (CMMN)
- 12:23Build microservices
- 12:42Scalability Considerations
- 15:33Key milestones in the history of open source BPM
- 23:26Flowable
- 25:20An active community is key to an open source project
related talks
50mProcess-oriented system integration
01h 00mBPM(N,S, engine) — Do We Need It or Not?
41mCode your logic, not your infrastructure
47mReplacing SAS Products with BPMS (jBPM)
12mStreamlining Business Workflows with Kogito: Automation Made Easy
32mMastering Enterprise Open Source for Cloud and Vendor Independence
19mJBoss Overview
28mWhy You Shouldn't Run Business Applications with a Build Tool