Reverse Hypercotractivity and Improved Sampling in High Dimensional Expanders
summary
Proves that many high-dimensional expanders satisfy reverse hypercontractivity by showing a concrete small-set mixing bound for two noise-like graphs (intersection-based J_{k,l} and coin-flip J_k^rho). For example with rho=1/4 and l = k/4, any A,B of size at least exp(-Omega(k)) have an edge probability at least (Pr[A] Pr[B])^{O(1)}. Proof uses sampler/containment graphs, a high-dimensional expander mixing lemma and a batching argument (j≈100, b=k/(4j)). Requires very strong expansion (lambda = exp(-Omega(k))) but the method succeeds under that assumption.
AI-written summary · about
chapters (15)
- 0:00Reverse hypercontractivity intro
- 1:47High-dimensional expanders and simplicial complexes
- 3:19Reverse hypercontractivity in expanders
- 7:24Small-set mixing in expanders
- 11:17History of reverse hypercontractive inequalities
- 15:55Two-function reverse hypercontractivity
- 19:34Mixing and sampling in expanders
- 22:28Sampler graphs properties
- 25:45Sampler graphs examples and bounds
- 29:17Sampling in high-dim expanders
- 33:50Proof sketch for reverse hypercontractivity
- 37:10Batch sampling technique
- 41:01Inductive argument with batch processing
- 50:26Concluding remarks
- 52:23Q&A
